Neo

Administrators
  • Content count

    835
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    38

Neo last won the day on May 20

Neo had the most liked content!

7 Followers

About Neo

  • Rank
    Administrator

Recent Profile Visitors

1,443 profile views
  1. Another great article from KatIe. KATIE HOPKINS: The politicians now have hundreds of troops protecting them while telling the rest of us to Keep Calm, Stay 'United' and Carry On. But who is going to protect OUR kids from the terror THEY let in? I think just this headline summarises the situation. The people didnt want these immigrants, and were vilified as racists when they tried to raise the issue. And those who did want them, and actually made it happen are protected from the consequences. Is this the UK's "Let them eat cake" moment? When we start to look a little deeper into the situation,. we see a government that has stripped the right to privacy from its citizens to 'protect them from the terror they "let in"'. But then have actually ignored warnings from the terrorist's neighbours. So what was the point??
  2. To own a gun *legally*. If the state puts so many "illegal" hurdles in your way, a point comes where you just ignore the law. Would you rather follow the law and be killed in a violent robbery, or ignore it and live? in the UK many people have been arrested for hurting someone who has broken into their home. Apparently its illegal to defend yourself or your home. It reminds me of the scene from Demolition Man, where the police officer has to tell the criminal in a strict voice, "stop what you are doing." and if that doesnt work, use a more strict tone.
  3. Army sends 3,800 military troops to guard Buckingham Palace and key UK locations as PM warms ANOTHER terror attack is 'imminent' Armed troops will guard key locations in London including Downing street, Buckingham Palace, Scotland Yard Yet, no one attacked these places. They already have significant protection. Its the innocent people who they attack, who will still have no protection. Perhaps it is the parents of the victims they are seeking to protect themselves from?
  4. Instigate selective breeding programs. It is ludicrous that people who cannot afford children have them anyway, and usually these are the lowest intelligence people, who cannot support themselves, and will create more lives that equally cannot. When does this stop?
  5. I read this thought a few days ago: "No one should be forced by law to labour to support another, this is the definition of slavery" I dont think that's an exact quote, but that was the sentiment. It does amaze me how women have equality when it suits them, but have managed to retain in law that men must pay them alimony because they are not equal and cannot be expected to pay for themselves. How can this be? And often these are not small amounts. I believe if someone decides they do not want another person in their life, that should be the end of the matter, no money. Child support should be a small nominal amount, and certainty not keeping the woman in the style in which she is accustomed. It should be the same amount for every child. This would help society by keep parents together which is very important for children - a lot of our problems can be linked back to the single mothers dragging children up.
  6. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4533574/Manchester-s-Arndale-shopping-centre-evacuated.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailUK BREAKING NEWS: Armed police arrest man and screaming shoppers flee as Manchester's Arndale shopping centre is evacuated amid reports of 'big bang'
  7. "The fact that we have been here before, and the fact we need to say this again, does not make it any less true".... platitude... platitude... And as long as that is the only response we get, these attacks will happen again and again. Time for some action.
  8. Juice is fine, what is not fine is those comforter drink holder things ( I dont know the name for them) where a child is constantly sipping from them meaning their teeth are constantly exposed to sugar. Normally the saliva washes away anything like this, but when you are constantly sipping it is disastrous.
  9. Current figure is 19 dead and 50 injured. Now 22, and 59. With the election coming up, and the French people showing Muslims that "no matter how you hurt us we still wont vote for a leader that will stop you." I cannot say I am surprised. Was kinda expecting something, at some point this summer. But against children at a harmless concert? What utter evil is this? So what will happen next? Ban encryption? Ban privacy? How about stopping people who add nothing to our culture from living here? And eject the ones already here? No. its more likely to be the first two. Strange how an ISIS supported tweeted about the attack on the Arena 4 hours before it happened, but our billion pound spying industry didnt do anything. President Trump explained our problem some years ago. Of course, no one listened.
  10. Is that all you took out of that whole post? Some people might be gay in spite of that, rather than because of that.
  11. This article does not surprise me. We have turned something that could have created the most educated generation that ever lived, to be the most vacuous and selfish generation instead. The sum of the entire human knowledge, literature, everything at your fingertips. And what do we do? Take silly photos of ourselves, post what we had for dinner. I guess learning is boring. But so is working in a low skilled job because you never bothered to learn. Here is the article:- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/19/instagram-ranked-worst-social-network-young-peoples-mental-health/
  12. “What brings us together is that we are white, we are a people, we will not be replaced,” Spencer said at an afternoon protest, the first of two rallies he led in the town where he once attended the University of Virginia. This would be 100% totally fine, and encouraged if we just replaced the word white with black. And that is the real racism. If black people form groups, and think they are great and have an amazing culture. Why is that not supremacist? Why is it only a problem when white people do this? Its more cultural Marxism, that people are very much waking up to, and strongly rejecting. No, we wont let you destroy our culture.
  13. I agree with you about AI. Or rather robotics, self driving cars, automatic service at restaurants etc. Given this, and the millions of low IQ people this will put out of work, then I have to say I am very much in favour of depopulation of low IQ stocks. This should have happened in a very nice, slow, controlled way, decades ago. Perhaps financially rewarding those who cannot afford to have children, to you know, actually not have any. To sterilise felons. To mandate abortion in young girls who have zero chance of supporting a child. Sadly we have done the total opposite. Financially rewarding those who have more children. Heavily taxing the middle classes, who now find they cannot afford a big family, either no children, or just one or two. They cannot afford it, because they have been encouraged to get a degree which means a big debt, and then they are taxed to pay for all the children of those who do not work. By the time they can afford it, in their mid 30s, fertility is a huge problem. Its easy to get pregnant in your early 20s. Almost impossible in mid 30s. Then, the west collectively decided to allow sub 80 IQ migrants into their country. A group who will never pay for their own requirements, much less contribute to society at large. So although rewiring our behaviour is a great idea for a sci-fi film. I have to ask why? There is no need for so many people, and a great need for a lot less. Or we can just carry on the way we are doing, and life across the world will end up being like a third world shanty town.
  14. Despite Star Trek fans being well, mostly white geeky men. They have written the Star Trek reboot, to star mostly non-white women and a gay man. As one witty YouTuber commented "The U.S.S. Equalise with Captain Politically Kirect". I guess no lessons were learned from the huge flop that was the all women Ghostbusters. Star Trek has always been pretty much ahead of its time. A black woman officer on the bridge, in the original series, and a Russian character during a time when Russian's were seen as the enemy. The excellent Janeway in Voyager, but the thing about Janeway it never felt like she was there because "we must try a woman captain", she was hard as nails and brilliant in the role. Equally so the female engineer / half Klingon. But this feels forced. Very forced. Michelle Yeoh although excellent in martial arts films such as Crouching Tiger, has a very strong accent. Do people in the future really speak English with Chinese accent? Add to this Sonequa Martin-Green who was rather average in the Walking Dead. If the brief was to cast a female lead, I would have considered the excellent Maggie Q who is an excellent actress, ticks the diversity box and used to playing strong intelligent action roles. The difference about today, is almost every single show on TV is pushing the same liberal SJW agenda that most people hate. They hate it. They hate it in their everyday life, and the last thing they want to do is come home to relax and watch a show about it. So rather than being something special and unique, as it was in the 60s, its the same trash that gets one series and then is cancelled. And then they think people will pay to see this? No way. Did they forget the crowds as Trump rallies giving resounding cheers to Trump saying he hated political correctness? I think Hollywood in general has forgotten who their audience is, and instead of giving what their audience actually wants, you know stories about them! Stories that they can imagine themselves as being that role. They get what Hollywood wants to shape them into. But people dont choose to watch to get brainwashing (BBC viewers aside - and they are forced to pay or go to jail) Finally, why is is another prequel? We already had Enterprise, which was generally well liked thought not as popular as some of the other series. How about carrying the story on after Voyager? Why? They have run out of ideas! Their creativity has gone. Instead we will get a prequel where the ships are strangely more technically advanced than the original Star Trek. From the small amount i have seen so far, I will be very surprised if this gets a second series. Will lessons be learnt? Will they realise who their audience is and what they want? I suspect not.
  15. I dont think we need "The Lord" to tell us Trump is in danger. Look at who stands against him, all the evil in America and the world. GLP is a controlled narrative forum.