Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'myers-briggs'.
Found 2 results
http://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/type http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/mbti-basics/home.htm Extraverted (E) vs. Introverted (I) Sensing (S) vs. Intuition (N) Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F) Judging (J) vs. Perceiving (P) You are supposed to take the test and you get one letter from each pair, which classifies your personality into one of 24=16 types. It is never admitted as such, but all these "types" are highly sexualized categories. The first one in each pair is the "masculine" stereotype, and the second one is "feminine." Rather that actual types, these are false dichotomies derived from social sexual stereotypes. E-I: think about it: the man is supposed to ask the woman on the date, not the other way around. S-N: men are supposed to see what they see, hear what they hear, etc., while women are famous for their intuition. T-F: men are supposed to think; women are supposed to feel. J-P: men are supposed to be judgmental while women are perceptive. So "normal" men are ESTJ and "normal" women are "INFP." The entire typology is an attempt to assess the gender-appropriateness of your personality and enforce gender norms in a highly sexualized society, but that is never admitted by the shrinks. It is yet another implement in the "LGBT"-haters' toolbox.
All large public and private sector employers in the U.S. assess all employees, applicants, and the population at large on this scale. They maintain secret records, and take this personality assessment very seriously. If you don't pass the Myers-Briggs, you don't get hired. https://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp They say what they say, but here's the real deal. The types range from a masculine ideal ESTJ (Extravert Sensing Thinking Judging) to a feminine ideal INFP (Introvert Intuitive Feeling Perceiving). We've got to attack the real locker-room trash right where it hurts. There are four "masculine defectives." Of the four traits of the masculine ideal, drop one and substitute its "feminine" counterpart. So: ISTJ, ENTJ, ESFJ, & ESTP. ISTJ is the "party pooper," an anal-receptive homosexual. ENTJ is "paranoid schizophrenic" - too much intuition and not enough common sense. ESFJ is the "Romeo" too easily "lovestruck" - heart on his sleeve, falls for any lady on the street, etc. ESTP is the "liberal" freethinker, must be watched, might be subversive, etc., etc. I know this is not flattering, but let's get to the "feminine defectives" now. Same exercise. Take the feminine ideal INFP, drop one of the four characteristics, and substitute its masculine counterpart. So, ENFP, ISFP, INTP, & INFJ. ENFP is too outgoing, a total whore. ISFP is stupid and easily taken advantage of because she lacks woman's intuition and doesn't know her place. INTP is a "bluestocking" intellectual, librarian-type woman. INFJ has internalized feelings of guilt and self-judgment, a closeted lesbian. The six remaining types, (4 choose 2 as the math nerds say,) are total cannon fodder. We really do need not only small arms but heavy artillery and nuclear weapons to dump this shit, but it will never happen with these crooked psychiatrists and personality typologist Nazi freaks in control of human resources. Is there any legal way to exact retribution even to the last penny and the last drop of blood from these horrible data-hoarding privacy-violating shrink-heads? Surely there is some way, and surely there is the will to follow through to victory in battle over this false personality typology madness. Anyways, I'm mixing up the civilian and military versions of the Myers-Briggs, because the civilian version does not specify gender or endorse masculine and feminine "ideals." So when I say there are six remaining types, I am talking about the "mixed" types with two characteristics of the feminine ideal and two of the masculine. The "mixed types", in the military version of the typology, are further split off into definite masculine and feminine versions. This gives us a total of 22 rather than 16 types as in the civilian version, and this is the real mushroom cloud stuff. Now I've never read the book, but I have no doubt that the title of Joseph Heller's Catch-22 is at least a veiled reference to this system of personality types. The "catch-22" was that you were mentally ill, suicidal, and unfit for duty if you were willing to fly a dangerous mission over Japan, and you were insubordinate and subject to military discipline if you were not. Finally, to heck with it, we flew over anyways and dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as we all know. Man can only endure so much personality typing and subtyping before he becomes angry enough to justify to himself such acts of annihilation and desolation in a state of total war. Don't forget, these types are originally the work of pre-WWI Austrian psychologist Carl Jung, and we had to conquer the same evil in Japan in WWII. Once again we are at the point of universal military conscription and nuclear war over the same madness which we failed to eradicate in two world wars. Like a cancer this psychological personality typology classification has metastasized and sickened society everywhere. Who knows? Targeted ionizing radiation therapy, delivered in carefully measured, devastating blasts, may indeed be the cure. Because this cancer must, once again, be stopped, no matter what the cost or collateral damage.