Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'top-secret'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • The Real Conspiracy Forum
    • General Forum
    • Government, NWO and Politics
    • Immigration Forum
    • Religious Conspiracies
    • Corporation Conspiracies
    • Alien Conspiracies, UFOs etc
    • Paranormal
    • Health Conspiracies
    • Technology
  • The Inconspiracy Section
    • About The Real Conspiracy Forum
    • Off Topic

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 3 results

  1. https://www.cnn.com/travel/amp/ireland-ufo-pilots-intl/index.html I suspect top secret German military response to threatened "Brexit." This is serious.
  2. All large public and private sector employers in the U.S. assess all employees, applicants, and the population at large on this scale. They maintain secret records, and take this personality assessment very seriously. If you don't pass the Myers-Briggs, you don't get hired. https://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp They say what they say, but here's the real deal. The types range from a masculine ideal ESTJ (Extravert Sensing Thinking Judging) to a feminine ideal INFP (Introvert Intuitive Feeling Perceiving). We've got to attack the real locker-room trash right where it hurts. There are four "masculine defectives." Of the four traits of the masculine ideal, drop one and substitute its "feminine" counterpart. So: ISTJ, ENTJ, ESFJ, & ESTP. ISTJ is the "party pooper," an anal-receptive homosexual. ENTJ is "paranoid schizophrenic" - too much intuition and not enough common sense. ESFJ is the "Romeo" too easily "lovestruck" - heart on his sleeve, falls for any lady on the street, etc. ESTP is the "liberal" freethinker, must be watched, might be subversive, etc., etc. I know this is not flattering, but let's get to the "feminine defectives" now. Same exercise. Take the feminine ideal INFP, drop one of the four characteristics, and substitute its masculine counterpart. So, ENFP, ISFP, INTP, & INFJ. ENFP is too outgoing, a total whore. ISFP is stupid and easily taken advantage of because she lacks woman's intuition and doesn't know her place. INTP is a "bluestocking" intellectual, librarian-type woman. INFJ has internalized feelings of guilt and self-judgment, a closeted lesbian. The six remaining types, (4 choose 2 as the math nerds say,) are total cannon fodder. We really do need not only small arms but heavy artillery and nuclear weapons to dump this shit, but it will never happen with these crooked psychiatrists and personality typologist Nazi freaks in control of human resources. Is there any legal way to exact retribution even to the last penny and the last drop of blood from these horrible data-hoarding privacy-violating shrink-heads? Surely there is some way, and surely there is the will to follow through to victory in battle over this false personality typology madness. Anyways, I'm mixing up the civilian and military versions of the Myers-Briggs, because the civilian version does not specify gender or endorse masculine and feminine "ideals." So when I say there are six remaining types, I am talking about the "mixed" types with two characteristics of the feminine ideal and two of the masculine. The "mixed types", in the military version of the typology, are further split off into definite masculine and feminine versions. This gives us a total of 22 rather than 16 types as in the civilian version, and this is the real mushroom cloud stuff. Now I've never read the book, but I have no doubt that the title of Joseph Heller's Catch-22 is at least a veiled reference to this system of personality types. The "catch-22" was that you were mentally ill, suicidal, and unfit for duty if you were willing to fly a dangerous mission over Japan, and you were insubordinate and subject to military discipline if you were not. Finally, to heck with it, we flew over anyways and dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as we all know. Man can only endure so much personality typing and subtyping before he becomes angry enough to justify to himself such acts of annihilation and desolation in a state of total war. Don't forget, these types are originally the work of pre-WWI Austrian psychologist Carl Jung, and we had to conquer the same evil in Japan in WWII. Once again we are at the point of universal military conscription and nuclear war over the same madness which we failed to eradicate in two world wars. Like a cancer this psychological personality typology classification has metastasized and sickened society everywhere. Who knows? Targeted ionizing radiation therapy, delivered in carefully measured, devastating blasts, may indeed be the cure. Because this cancer must, once again, be stopped, no matter what the cost or collateral damage.
  3. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/chelsea-mannings-commutation-what-it-means-w461542 https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/17/politics/julian-assange-wikileaks-chelsea-manning/index.html Presidents and governors often grant criminal pardons and commute prison sentences in their final days of office. There are several things a little bit odd about this case. A military prison is certainly not a pleasant place for anyone transgender. At the same time, there is something a little bit funny about just letting Manning go under such dishonorable circumstances. Obama's commutation was not a full pardon, in any event. I do not think that Donald Trump "has it in" for Manning. I rather think the case is quite to the contrary. I think Trump would have objected to the torture and cruel and unusual punishment which was taking place in prison where Manning was held, much as Obama did. At the same time, Trump is under a lot of political pressure himself in office, and he cannot intervene in that case from where he stands now without jeopardizing his own legal position. I do not see the same hostility from Trump and the "alt-right" toward Manning, Assange, Snowden, and the Wikileaks camp as I saw from Obama and the establishment Democrats. The Wikileaks folks are liberal; I wouldn't mistake them for conservatives or right-wingers, but at the same time, I do think they fell out of line with certain more "established" fellow Democrats and really made enemies of them, much more so than they ever offended the Republicans, the Tea Party, the Alt-Right, etc. The Libertarians would call these establishment Democrats "statist conservatives," putting them completely in the opposite corner of a four-quadrant political space from where they envision themselves. And obviously there are quite a few Republicans who hold to such statist or big-government authoritarian conservatism as well, which is why the Tea Party and the Alt-Right are so disgruntled. That big-government authoritarianism is taking away our guns, property, rights, and freedoms without the due process of law, something to which the establishment Democrats refuse to object under any circumstances whatsoever. The information Manning released was the kind of information that would have endangered lives, let us grant that, but there is strong evidence that the information never was the secret from the enemy which it was purported to be. Ergo, it was not, in fact, classified, as it was claimed to be in the case against Manning. There was too much conflation in the court martial of the facts of the criminal case against Manning with the general "offensiveness" of her transgender condition. There was (and still is) a strong and deliberate cultivation of that offensiveness and hate on the part of many who barely knew the individual on trial. This has got to relate somehow to Eric Snowden's refuge in Russia as well as the trumped-up rape charges against Assange. This whole thing is starting to come together as a grand conspiracy, and it is taking a very long time to sort out without access to full information.