Sign in to follow this  
Martin Timothy

House Speaker Pelosi Wants to Impeach Trump

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Nancy Pelosi Announces Official Impeachment Inquiry.

To impeach the President one must present evidence of "High Crimes & Misdemeanors," House Speaker Pelosi's call defies logic in the face of her [and DT's] refusal to countenance Jewish guilt for 911 .. what has she got on Trump in any case, both are tools of the Jews as far as I can tell.


In the US context the framers of the Constitution set up the impeachment process to be a way Congress can remove the President from power. First, the House of Representatives has the power to impeach the President. A simple majority is necessary for an article of impeachment to be approved.

Each article lays out a charge against the President, then the process moves to the Senate where a trial will be held, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Presiding. Finally and crucially it takes a two thirds vote from the Senate to actually convict a President on any count. Conviction on any count would then remove the President from office and put the Vice President in power.

Note that two-thirds of the Senate — 67 votes in the modern era — is a very high threshold that’s almost never achieved on any matter that’s remotely partisan. The framers did not make it easy for Congress to remove a democratically elected President from power.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Democrats are out of their open bleeding-heart liberal minds.

>>> Could This Straight Shooter Bring Trump One Step Closer to Impeachment?
>>> “He’s been at this a long time and he’s not about to give that all up to protect anyone,” one State Department official told The Daily Beast.

>>> There’s a new character about to take the stage in the impeachment drama. President Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo may not like what he has to say.

>>> Phil Reeker, the assistant secretary of State in the Bureau of Europe and Eurasian Affairs, is set to appear for questioning Saturday on Capitol Hill.

"Coming out" as if they are queer. A "straight shooter," i.e., a Blood gangster or "top-hatter" with top-secret security clearance and implicit authorization to kill or order kills on behalf of the President. Pompeo himself is a staunch Democrat. Let's not assume he is on the same side as Trump of any particular controversy. Bloods are a local neighborhood offshoot of the Italian or Sicilian Mafia, who collaborate with Crips on the political left despite sometimes intense rivalry; as the Italians collaborated with the German Nazis during the Great Depression, Holocaust and Second World War.

Reeker will, of course, bring to  bear the Asian part of the same old WWII Axis.

I am dumbfounded.

The Democrats are covering up crimes in Ukraine while they threaten to impeach Donald Trump on their own blue-dyed political claims and criminal charges.

The Democrats are starting World War Three, and they are not on the same side as FDR -- and even he was a Democrat, now that I think about it, and that's why we have Daylight Savings Time, abortion "rights," closed-shop labor unions, fascist gun control and all that other German Nazi shit even though we were supposed to have won the war.

Meanwhile a horde of Title IX female EEO // DOE labor-union local party cops are hard at work polishing male resumes on the Allied side with a party aim to "level the playing field" in an employment market which is further rigged by Axis feds.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

John Bolton, yet another career liberal military officer twirling his mustache and picking up the ladies on the left.

>>> President Trump's former national security adviser, John Bolton, is known as a conservative foreign policy hawk. But he is turning into a key figure in the Democratic-led impeachment inquiry of Trump.

>>> "All administrations are tempted to do bad things and have people who have bad instincts or wrong instincts," said Danielle Pletka, who oversees the conservative American Enterprise Institute's work on foreign policy and defense.

Trouble is, John Bolton is a NATO // EU // Asian Trilateral foreign policy hawk, and not really a conservative one, either.

>>> In 2009, American Enterprise Institute, a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization, received the contribution from the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO), Taiwan’s equivalent to an embassy.

So guns are banned and we still aren't allowed to manufacture anything in the USA, and shit made in Taiwan does not improve upon shit made in China.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Foreign-influenced Democratic partisan impeachment proceedings continue.

Army Officer Who Heard Trump’s Ukraine Call Reported Concerns

The top Ukraine expert at the White House will tell impeachment investigators he twice reported concerns about President Trump’s pressure tactics on Ukraine, acting out of a “sense of duty.”

Alexander S. Vindman is a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army. Do privates generally listen in to their sergeants' phone calls out of a misplaced sense of duty? The President of the United States is not allowed to make a diplomatic phone call without a whole slew of politically hostile advisors, insubordinate military personnel, Secret Service (which treats Presidents as felons), and politically motivated Democratic National Security Agency employees listening in.

Are such "concerns," along with a vague and unspecified sense of duty that does not correspond to the Constitution of the United States, sufficient to justify breaking ranks from the official and established chain of command in the U.S. military without meeting the usual standard of "probable cause" to accuse the President of an actual crime? The President is Commander in Chief of the U.S. military, after all, or at least he is supposed to be, according to the U.S. Constitution? But to whom are the Democrat impeachment dogs most loyal? A former lesbian Congresswoman on the make in the mainstream media? A voluntary power blackout in California?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

And now the Democrats want to recall Alaska's Governor Mike Dunleavy.

Dunleavy made judicious use of the governor's constitutional line-item veto in order to massively cut Democrat spending by the state government, and is now politically targeted by aggressive government employee unions who OPPOSE guns in general, the U.S. military in particular, and all domestic energy sources for the sake of worker safety, local retailing, tourism, environmentalism, total world peace, and NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) // NHIWTRMK (Not How I Want To Raise My Kids) ...

It's time to save Dunleavy from this sham recall by hardened Democrat white- and blue-collar criminals and stop the massive Democrat government over-spending and organized criminal financial malfeasance with respect to taxpayers' money.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

>>> The move signals the start of a shift from closed-doors investigation of Trump's covert Ukraine policy into an attempt to convince Americans that he should be removed from office in dramatic televised hearings.

The Democrat "impeachment" inquiry has shifted over to a vicious stonewalling political campaign for the 2020 U.S. elections, when Trump will face a Democrat opponent, probably Joe Biden or Elizabeth Warren. In any event the Democrats still don't have (a) an actual cause to impeach Donald Trump or (b) a viable candidate for the 2020 Democrat presidential ballot ticket.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

>>> In a significant reversal, a top US diplomat revised his testimony to impeachment investigators to admit a quid pro quo linking US aid to Ukraine with an investigation into President Donald Trump's political rival.

>>> US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland on Monday sent the committees a three-page addition to his testimony, ...

>>> KIEV, Ukraine — When the Ukrainian prosecutor Kostiantyn H. Kulyk compiled a seven-page dossier in English that accused the son of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. of corruption, he helped set off a political firestorm that has led to the impeachment investigation of President Trump.

>>> But even as he was reopening a corruption case related to Hunter Biden’s service on the board of Burisma Holdings, a major Ukrainian gas company, Mr. Kulyk himself was under a cloud of suspicion.

So what could Joe Biden or his son Hunter possibly be doing wrong in Ukraine, while they insist on impeaching President Donald Trump?

And what sort of gun-control Democrat politician would name his son "Hunter" anyway? What a cruel joke when guns are banned because of alleged mental issues!

(CNN)The top US diplomat in Ukraine told Congress that it was his "clear understanding" that US security aid to Ukraine wouldn't happen unless the country's president announced he would investigate President Donald Trump's political rivals, according to a transcript of Ambassador Bill Taylor's deposition released Wednesday.

It is longstanding ethical practice for the U.S. to tie foreign aid to foreign law enforcement commitments to investigate and prosecute public corruption. Not a cause to impeach a sitting President of the U.S. Not even remotely. Not even if there is direct "quid pro quo" as the Democrats claim. Unfortunately the cold hard truth will have to be pounded through the Democrats' seven-inch thick skulls on the matter of obstructing the general administration of government by fraudulent and frivolous impeachment proceedings in Congress. This calls for more ethics investigations of Democrat individuals who have been elected to the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate. The aggressive ballot-stuffing and theft of ballots on the watch of local Democrat government officials will have to be investigated and prosecuted as well, for multiple Congressional, state legislative, and gubernatorial elections that have taken place in treacherous conditions under local city hall Democrat supervision throughout the United States; whence the vicious expression, "All politics is local."

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

More action by money-grubbing Democrats:

It is totally clear to us, the people, that the Democrats must be stopped at all costs in order to halt the United States' progressive, boiling-the-frog march into European national socialism if not outright Marxist communism.

It is not clear to us that Republicans are up to the task.

Live updates: Ukraine expert who listened to Trump’s call says ‘there was no doubt’ the president was seeking investigations of political rivals

But no alarm was sounded in the "intelligence community" of top-secret-cleared Democrats when it was Trump's political rivals who sought to investigate Trump's own dealings in Ukraine and Russia.

It is looking like Ukraine's Democrat-only government kicked out Trump in favor of Joe Biden. Political favoritism of which Trump is the victim and not the beneficiary; if anyone should be deemed to have received an "emolument" or greasy palms in Ukraine, it is Joe Biden, not Trump.

In 2006, Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump traveled to Ukraine to meet with government officials about building a multimillion dollar hotel and golf course in the country.

... Now, a decade after his company’s efforts floundered, President Donald Trump is arguing that it’s the son of his political rival Joe Biden, not him, who wanted to benefit from what he calls a “very corrupt” Ukraine.

Biden’s role at Burisma Holdings Ltd has come under intense scrutiny following unsupported accusations by U.S. President Donald Trump that Joe Biden improperly tried to help his son’s business interests in Ukraine.

Interviews with more than a dozen people, including executives and former prosecutors in Ukraine, paint a picture of a director who provided advice on legal issues, corporate finance and strategy during a five-year term on the board, which ended in April of this year.

Biden never visited Ukraine for company business during that time, according to three of the people.

They also said that his presence on the board didn’t protect the company from its most serious challenge: a series of criminal investigations launched by Ukrainian authorities against its owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, a multimillionaire former minister of ecology and natural resources. The allegations concern tax violations, money-laundering and licences given to Burisma during the period where Zlochevsky was a minister.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Meanwhile the real impeachment quandary is that of Benjamin Netanyahu, prime minister of Israel.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was indicted Thursday on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust in a set of long-running corruption cases, ...

Israelis don't play golf. To them that is the sport of Sodomites.

Mainstream media news coverage is the target of the corruption charges, which are running up against fundamental issues of the freedom of the press.

City hall is dictating the official news in Israel as well as America and Europe.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Democrats quietly debate expanding impeachment articles beyond Ukraine

>>>Ultimately the decision will come down to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and her leadership team, who have been wary of impeachment blowback on moderate Democrats. Those same lawmakers encouraged Pelosi and leaders to keep impeachment narrowly focused on Ukraine, a strategy they believed would help them weather any political backlash in next November’s elections.

>>>Some moderates, however, see an advantage to multiple articles, according to three Democratic officials familiar with conversations who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk freely. A few moderates have actually encouraged leadership to let them vote against some articles of impeachment on the House floor while backing others, a move that would allow centrists taking heat back home to show a degree of independence from their party’s left flank and their leadership.<<<

It's the same old cynical strategy from "moderate" Democrats who are in reality extremists in pursuit of totalitarian gun control, pro-abortion, birth control, circumcision, mandatory vaccines, tooth extraction, mental health civil commitment, involuntary psychiatric treatment, and so on and so forth. They are after our lives, liberty and property, and they have no respect whatsoever for the due process of law; for the "law" to those amoral Democrats is only a tool for the strong to oppress the weak and for the Mob to harass and persecute targeted individuals under the guise of statehood and official government.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

350 health professionals sign letter to Congress claiming Trump's mental health is deteriorating dangerously amid impeachment proceedings

And mental health civil commitment with no possible defense in court, at the sole discretion and judgment of Democrat psychiatrists, remains an absolute lifetime bar to gun ownership in America, as per  regulations subject to a vicious and arbitrary Orwellian Democrat interpretation in federal court ...

It is unheard of in the United States, ever since the passage of the Vietnam Communist Party Gun Control Act of 1968, for anyone deemed to have been so adjudicated either (a) to have had an actual defense in court at the time, or (b) ever to have gun rights restored.

San Francisco Mayor Seeks Mental Health Bond on November Ballot

And that's the mainstream media news channel owned by just one of those fucking Democrat idiots who want to impeach Trump and gain the White House in 2020.

>>> “We need to move forward. We have no time to waste,” [London] Breed wrote.

Democrats are on a Blitzkrieg. They're so progressive they're tripping on their own left foot.

They're running out of time, too.

Democrats say Trump impeachment charges must come swiftly

Of course. The Democrats are fast running out of credibility for their dreams of impeaching an incumbent Republican president as the 2020 primary election season approaches.

Not that it's "technically" impossible, but the overt hostility of unfounded partisan criminal accusations of purely political motivation serves to invalidate the whole process before it even gets off the ground.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

And now Donald Trump is "anti-Semitic." As if.

>>> 'Trump’s insistence on using anti-Semitic tropes when addressing Jewish audiences is dangerous,' said Aaron Keyak, the former head of the National Jewish Democratic Council

>>> U.S. President Donald Trump sparked controversy during a speech Saturday in which he said there are some Jewish people in America who don’t love Israel enough. He added that his Jewish audience should “be my biggest supporters because you’ll be out of business in about 15 minutes” with 2020 Democratic candidate Elizabeth Warren’s wealth tax.

Anti-Semitic? Now who's going after the Jew's money with a "wealth tax"? Oh, yeah, it's the same folks who are going after Trump's tax returns and Trump's money. The Democrats.

Trump is simply pointing out that some Jewish people are Democrats, but unless you are a Democrat, you are considered anti-Semitic if you campaign for the Jewish vote. But a Democrat is a Democrat. How are Jewish Democrats any better than Nazi Democrats?

Haaretz is mainstream liberal pro-Palestinian press masquerading as Jewish. Yuck.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.